We Won again! 1/12/07

• How you can help
• Contributors
• Case Information
• Other Cases
• More links about Steven Paul Rombom (Aka Rambam)

On August 26, 2003, I decided to give in to the criminals who were ddos (distributed denial of service) attacking my systems, because of a hobby I was one of the participants of, and shut down relays.osirusoft.com. Several months later, the criminals were identified as an employee of foonet.net, and arrests were made. During the attack, Steve Rombom, AKA Steve Rambam of Pallorium.com called me and informed me he was going to sue me, and in December of 2003 began legal preceedings against me and my company, OsiruSoft Research & Engineering. Irrespective of obvious facts, he has chosen to go after me and my company with full intention of driving it into bankruptcy by making it financially impossible to win. I have since employed the counsel of Aaron Morris, Esq, of www.toplawfirm.com as an effort to minimize sanctions and to win this case, but again, that would have been Steve's goal, to make it costly enough for me to defend myself to bankrupt my company from such a ridiculous and frivilous lawsuit.

Relays.osirusoft.com has not once received funding for its operations at any time, because I take a rigid attitude towards hobbies that they are non-existant entities. Contributions are only received to offset the cost of defending myself in court against Pallorium, and any excesses, if they exist will go towards cases that involve other fellow anti spam individual's cases.

If you would like to help, send your checks or money orders to:
OsiruSoft Research & Engineering
4889 LaBelle Drive
Columbus, OH 43232
In the memo field, please reference Pallorium Vs. Jared.
Paypal donations can be made to: joejared@oretek.com

• 10/21/2003 P Summons
• 10/21/2003 P Complaint
• 01/09/2004 D Response to complaint (Motion to strike word document)
• 02/01/2004 DDefendants motion to amend answer
• 04/25/2004 P First set of specially prepared interogatories
• 04/25/2004 P First demand for production
• 04/26/2004 D Response to interogatory
• 04/26/2004 D Response to demand for production
• 07/23/2004 D Corrected response to Document Demands
• 07/23/2004 D Corrected response to interogatories and admissions
• 07/23/2004 D Opposition to Motion to compel
• 07/23/2004 D Response to Form Interogatories
• 07/19/2005 J The Judge's ruling on the case
• 07/29/2005 P Plaintiff's objection to the ruling
• 08/09/2005 J Response to Plaintiff's objection and final ruling
• 09/30/2005 P Plaintiff's notice of appeal
• 01/12/2007 P Opinion confirming previous ruling
• 04/04/2007 P Petition for Review to the California Supreme court
• 04/04/2007 D Answer to Supreme Court Petition

• Atriks, et al vs Jay Stuler

• Prytulak vs rambam and Kurtz vs. Prytulak
• Jewish Defense Organization page on Steve Rombom

As should be obvious from the referenced cases, this lawsuit will continue ad infinitum, and will be appealed and refiled until its conclusion serves Mr Rombom's needs. This lawsuit has little if anything to do with reality, more like being a bullseye in a targetting range. Mr. Rombom is fully aware of the hobbiest nature of the site, as well as the ddos attack against it, prohibiting the ability to help him. To that end, Mr. Rombom has gone through my entire life as an attempt to intimidate, extort ($12,000 was the last attempted extortion), and harrass. The irony of this tactic is that it is the exact tactic that has been used against him in past years, and the exact reason he is suing others.